[Tagging] Contents of tagging digest, Vol 41, Issue 8, message 4

[St Niklaas]

> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 18:57:36 +0100
> From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> 	<tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bridge types
> Message-ID:
> 	<CABPTjTC1onh4O7ZegqA7cb7zYk6WVqvD78Q478hRFTbAsSn+0w at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>Hi Martin, 

> null
> viaduct
> A ''long'' rail, road, or other bridge made up of many short spans.
> no
> 7?572 0.45%   hint for other mappers, no special treatmentI used that one, after reading the Wiki I abandoned it.+1

> null
> aqueduct
> 1?084 0.06%  prefer historic=aqueduct for historic aqueducts (also
> fragments) and would rather introduce a tag similar to "power" for
> water if I wanted to map modern aqueducts. Anyway an aqueduct has not
> much to do with bridges-1Both are IMHO originally latin, a viaduct is a crossing between 2 ways and a aquaduct a crossing between a way and a waterway. The last one has always a track or even 2 besides or above the waterway. Whats the difference between this 'bridge' and a the other ones ? Since I use them to cross a valley or a highway, since there less footbridges over that kind of obstacles.
GreetzHendrik 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130203/b8d170c1/attachment.html>