[Tagging] Re : Ski resort (once again)
chaoschaos0909 at googlemail.com
Mon Feb 4 19:06:19 GMT 2013
2013/2/4 Janko Mihelić <janjko at gmail.com>
> 2013/2/4 Ronnie Soak <chaoschaos0909 at googlemail.com>
>> Works exactly as long as no piste belongs to more than one resort. If
>> anyone does, you still need to switch to relations.
>> I don't know about nordic pistes, but there are definitely lifts for
>> alpine pistes that are used by visitors of two ski resorts.
> There, I fixed it to work with semicolon delimited values:
You may want to read this wiki page:
It gives you a lot of reasons not to use semicolon delimited values. But
admittedly it doesn't give relations as an alternative.
While I also see that skiing resorts are kind of geographically and
therefore could be expressed as an area instead of a relation, I'm having
trouble with how anyone would be able to determine where to put that border.
They are, for the part I know, mostly defined by the pistes/lifts/amenities
that belong to it instead of a border on the map. And I'm somehow not
comfortable with an area which borders are defined by a mapper at his own
discretion instead of a survey-able feature on the ground.
My favorite therefore is still a relation, but I'm cutting out of this
argument now, as skiing definitely isn't my area of expertise.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging