[Tagging] Re : Ski resort (once again)

yvecai yvecai at gmail.com
Mon Feb 4 20:44:48 GMT 2013

On 02/04/2013 08:26 PM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
> ...

There is always an overpass query for every need :)

Anyway, these site=piste relation members would simply be related by ... 
Minimal tagging would be:
 > type=site
 > site=piste
 > piste:type=nordic


 > type=site
 > site=piste
 > piste:type=downhill

Then, optionnally, name, operator, url.

Members would be the ways described in the pistemap tagging scheme, and 
relations route=piste or route=ski.

I'm not sure pistes ways or relation should be given the role 'piste' as 
it is implicit. Same for upward lifts :)
The only role that came to mind are the role 'entrance', 'link' (to 
another site),'perimeter' (if avail.).

I came here about this idea when I was shown this: 
Maybe these cafes, shelters, ... could be members of the site relation, 
maybe not, but there is apparently a need here to link them to the 
nearby pistes.


More information about the Tagging mailing list