[Tagging] Disused/historic railway stations

[Greg Troxel]

Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> writes:

> 2013/2/7 Greg Troxel <gdt at ir.bbn.com>:
>> ... because in the present, railway=station means the
>> site and we don't really denote the building.  In the historic:,
>> railway=station is the building and railway=station_site is the place.
>
>
> -1, better use always "building" for the building and
> "railway=station" for the station (function)

I'm sympathetic to that, but what tag goes on the building way other
than building=yes to denote that a building is a station building?  Or
was?

Perhaps
  railway=station_building
  historic:railway=station_building
would be appropriate.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130206/521d3cf0/attachment-0001.pgp>