[Tagging] Amenity=shelter for field shelter?

Alberto albertoferraris at fastwebnet.it
Sat Feb 23 17:42:03 UTC 2013


Some time has passed but nothing has been changed on the Wiki.
So about amenity=shelter + shelter_type=field_shelter + (if necessary)
access=private, should I create a proposal page and vote it to change [1]
and [2] or should I simply update these pages according to what we discussed
here?

[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal

Alberto - Viking81

-----------------------------

Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:24:17 +0100
From: Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm at gmail.com>

Makes sense. So we're back to amenity.

Something like amenity=shelter + shelter_type=field_shelter + (if
necessary) access=private should cover it.

Martin

2013/2/6 Alberto <albertoferraris at fastwebnet.it>:
> I'm against animal=shelter. As emerged in previous discussions, an 
> animal is not a shelter.
> It exists amenity=animal_shelter [1] for large structures with a staff 
> that takes care of animals and that eventually heals them.
> On taginfo already exists animal=shelter, and in many cases it has 
> been used to tag what now is tagged with amenity=animal_shelter. The 
> migration is slow because we have to check every single case.
> For consistency with other shelter's tags [2], I would use:
> amenity=shelter
> shelter_type=field_shelter
> The availability can be specified by access=* tags.
> After all if you need a shelter against bad weather, you can use also 
> a field shelter, if it is accessible. In this sense consistency with 
> amenity=shelter tag is useful.
> You should also update page on shelters [2] and on animals [3] when 
> we'll agree on field shelters' tagging.
>
> [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_shelter
> [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type
> [3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal
>
> Alberto - Viking81







More information about the Tagging mailing list