[Tagging] Open of discussion on "operational_status" (part of life cycle with disused/abandoned/demolished)

Bryce Nesbitt bryce2 at obviously.com
Wed Jul 3 01:23:12 UTC 2013

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> I have no strong opinion on the general idea but one thing sticks out:
> "operational_status=operating".
> Obviously, this should be the default assumption. If there's a toilet
> mapped then I assume that it is working.

I have added a note that "working" is the assumed default in the absence of
a tag.  Thank you.
Most of the objects in OSM do serve their basic function just fine, and no
mass tagging is proposed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130702/1b9bff0c/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list