[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Power transmission refinement
francois.lacombe at telecom-bretagne.eu
Thu Jul 25 22:11:40 UTC 2013
2013/7/25 Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>
> Your attitude is wrong enough that I'm motivated to seek your proposal out
> and downvote it!
Please can you explain me why ?
My proposal is based upon widely accepted definitions.
You can't say "ok it's wrong" without any justification.
How do you want me to change anything if you're going this way ?
Please note that power generation refinement was built identically : IEC
definitions against OSM legacy usages and it was accepted even if
power=generator used to be for power plants mapping.
francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging