[Tagging] When was landuse=reservoir deprecated ?

[fly]

Am 11.06.2013 15:00, schrieb Greg Troxel:
> 
> fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com> writes:
> 
>   > Having been away from this for a bit, I would propose:
>   > 
>   >   Add a landuse=reservoir_protection (or some other name, not in use) to
>   >   be for the landuse of a parcel that is used for containing a reservoir
>   >   and protection zones.   (I have an attitude that landuse will often
>   >   align with parcel boundaries.)
> 
>   There are already protected areas under boundary [1]. So reservoirs
>   would be class eleven or 15.

Class eleven is for drinking water like your example below.
Class 15 is fro flodding like my example.

> This is perhaps not really the right place to discuss, but I think
> boundary=protected_area is off.  The basic issue is that we (I) are
> trying to denote landuse, not boundary.  Rendering the inside of a
> boundary as an area just seems incorrect to me; boundaries are linear
> features.   And "protected_area" is a kitchen sink concept.

They define an area like a national reserve or park but also low
priority protections. Please think of a flooding area which primary
landuse might be forest or meadow.

>> I was looking for a more tighter definition of landuse=reservoir which
>> would not include the whole flooding area but the area which primary use
>> is the reservoir including the water, the dam and any facility like a
>> tool shed.
> 
> I think this is the crux of the issue.  I am referring to reservoirs
> which are hard to tell from lakes, other than the "public water supply -
> no trespassing" signs.

So the water is tagged with water=reservoir (access=no) and we need a
landuse value for the primary area around it. I do not like
reservoir_protection though. Can we find a different name as I was
thinking about protected areas. Maybe something simple like
reservoir_ground or _area.

My two ct
fly