[Tagging] Reviving "pitlatrine" proposal from 2011

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

On 20/giu/2013, at 07:22, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com> wrote:

> I see a an alternative of:
> toilets:type=[flush,pit,chemical,bucket]
> 
> Thus we might have:
> 
> amenity=toilets
> toilets:type=pit
> drinking_water=yes
> fee=no


you can have pits with flush or without so this modification doesn't work. What are the benefits of the changes you propose?

cheers,
Martin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130620/2c42ca5d/attachment.html>