[Tagging] Open of discussion on "operational_status" (part of life cycle with disused/abandoned/demolished)

[fly]

Am 29.06.2013 07:37, schrieb Bryce Nesbitt:
> This is a proposal to fill a hole in the life cycle concepts (that of
> facilities /intended/ to be operational):
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:operational_status
> I have drawn from the HOT tagging, and from the experience mapping
> drinking fountain status with wetap:status

Exactly, what you do describe won't work. Please use a prefix if
something is broken. Software which wants to display these kind of
broken objects can look for this prefix and all other simply ignore it.

It would be really dangerous in a dry area if you need water and go to
route to a amenity=drinking_water only to find it broken.

I also do not think that we should use disused for something that has
ceased to exist on the ground.

Cheers
fly