[Tagging] Recreation_ground (landuse vs leisure)

Greg Troxel gdt at ir.bbn.com
Sun May 26 22:47:44 UTC 2013


"hannes.janetzek at gmail.com" <hannes.janetzek at googlemail.com> writes:

> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com
>> wrote:

      http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/j3d/edits

>> have you tried to contact him? AFAIK these mechanical edits haven't been
>> done following the guidelines for mechanical edits and it looks as if a
>> revert should be done.
>>
>
> Sorry, I was not aware of that policy. I will discuss such edits in future.
> Please revert if they are unreasonable

You should revert them yourself.  If you aren't comfortable doing
reverts, you should not be running a bot.  Fixing typos is one thing,
but your leisure->landuse changes are not in the category of "99.5% of
mappers think that they are obviously correct fixes".

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130526/2d12235b/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Tagging mailing list