[Tagging] Hiking route abandoned

[Fernando Trebien]

I'm sorry but maybe some misspellings changed the message. So let me
clarify.

Renderers often don't support life cycle tags, but that doesn't matter
because we don't tag for the renderer/applications, right? If you just add
a disused tag, the route likely will still be rendered in current map
styles made for hikers. That may or may not be a good thing. I think it's
good if the route is still open to the public, otherwise no.

Didn't mean to say hiking routes should not be rendered, sorry for the
confusion. I think they should.
On Oct 2, 2013 7:36 AM, "SomeoneElse" <lists at mail.atownsend.org.uk> wrote:

> Fernando Trebien wrote:
>
>>
>> Wouldn't the more generic disused=yes apply to this case? Rendering apps
>> should support lifecycle tags and render them accordingly (though often
>> then don't ...
>>
>>   I think that you've answered your own question already :)
>
>  ... and none would support this anyway).
>>
>>
> If you mean "don't render hiking routes" than that's obviously wrong; if
> you mean "don't render _disused_ hiking routes then that's probably a
> feature, but any that do render hiking routes that don't also look for
> disused=yes (or whatever) will miss it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andy
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/tagging<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131002/9b3149bb/attachment.html>