[Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways
Jonathan
bigfatfrog67 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 10 18:27:03 UTC 2013
It doesn't need a hint, it should be making that decision currently on
all routes: is it quicker to get off and push if that is allowed.
Nothing needs to change to support this other than to tag routes using
ACCESS that a bicycle can't be pushed on.
I reiterate, bicycle=dismount is a pointless tag, it shouldn't be
there. If you want to keep it then we need a car=slowdown and
car=speedup tags.
The only need I can think of where you need to signal an unusual change
that access can't cover is a turn restriction that says cycles can't
turn right but maybe have to use some underpass for safety reasons.
This is already covered by existing tags and methods.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 10/10/2013 19:03, Mike N wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 1:55 PM, Jonathan wrote:
>> The only way to tag the effect that the sign has is to change the access
>> tag to exclude bicycles.
>
> What about hints to the router that it's OK to send cyclists on this
> route instead of taking a longer route? Knowing that speed = walking
> speed + time to mount/dismount allows it to make a decision when to
> take a longer fully rideable route VS dismounting.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
More information about the Tagging
mailing list