[Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways

Jonathan bigfatfrog67 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 10 18:50:15 UTC 2013

Nope, the only difference is a way changes from a way that can contain 
cycles to a route that can't, it's an access issue.


On 10/10/2013 19:18, Mike N wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 2:13 PM, fly wrote:
>>> >What about hints to the router that it's OK to send cyclists on this
>>> >route instead of taking a longer route?   Knowing that speed = walking
>>> >speed + time to mount/dismount allows it to make a decision when to 
>>> take
>>> >a longer fully rideable route VS dismounting.
>> And why do you need bicycle=dismount for this ?
>> Think the width of the footpath is much more important.
>  Nope, the width of the path is the same - the only difference is the 
> side rails and the "bicyclists must dismount" sign.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

More information about the Tagging mailing list