[Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways

Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxford at gmail.com
Mon Oct 14 12:40:17 UTC 2013

bicycle=no on the entry/exit node should suffice for routing

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Stephen Gower <
socks-openstreetmap.org at earth.li> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:53:04AM +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
> wrote:
> >
> > and [Neither cycling nor pushing allowed] would be an area/route
> > explicitly signed as e.g.  "no bicycles not even pushed" (Oxford
> > University Parks used to be like this until a couple of years ago).
> Just for the record, this is still the case in Oxford University Parks,
> they
> had a few months trial of allowing people to push bikes, and shortly after
> the trial was over they put up the current, explicit signs:
> http://cycle.st/p53524 http://cycle.st/p53525 (text reads "NO CYCLES
> The same is also true of Christ Church Meadows: http://cycle.st/p17860
> http://cycle.st/p17861
> Given people seem to be saying bicycle=no doesn't correspond to this
> situation I'd be grateful for a tag, likely to be supported by routing
> software etc, that does.
> s
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131014/634fc989/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list