[Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways

Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) robert.whittaker+osm at gmail.com
Tue Oct 15 22:49:43 UTC 2013

On 14 October 2013 16:35, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/10/14 Richard Mann <richard.mann.westoxford at gmail.com>
>> bicycle=no on the entry/exit node should suffice for routing
> +1, for routing that should be sufficient, but not for mapping ;-)
> If they are explicitly forbidden on all ways it would not be bad to have it
> on all ways as explicit tag (IMHO).

That rather depends on whether bicycle=no is interpreted to mean "no
cycling" or "no bicycles" -- which seems to be the key thing we need
to agree on first.


Robert Whittaker

More information about the Tagging mailing list