[Tagging] tag proposal for soft play centres

Jonathan bigfatfrog67 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 24 13:23:05 UTC 2013


That's definitely better but I would make the description more generic, 
such as "An indoor area for children to play" and then make the padded 
aspects, cafe etc sub tags that can be added.  The indoor_play tag 
should be able to be used by those in other countries who have similar 
facilities but minus the padding or cafe.  The tage of indoor_play needs 
to be the umbrella tag.

Jonathan

http://bigfatfrog67.me

On 24/10/2013 12:13, Dominic Hosler wrote:
> Thanks, I feel a bit silly now, I didn't look hard enough.
> New page is at:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Indoor_play
> for anyone wanting another look.
> Thanks,
> Dom
>
>
> On 24 October 2013 12:04, Matthijs Melissen <info at matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote:
>> Use the arrow down button on the upper right (next to the Search box)
>> and choose 'Move'.
>>
>> -- Matthijs
>>
>> On 24 October 2013 12:59, Dominic Hosler <dominichosler at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have updated the page to indoor play, but I don't know how to
>>> actually change the title of the page?
>>>
>>> Do I need to just delete that one and create a new proposal called Indoor play?
>>> Putting a note in the discussion that it has been migrated from the
>>> previous soft play proposal?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dom
>>>
>>> On 23 October 2013 20:51, Dominic Hosler <dominichosler at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I agree we should move away from the trademarked title 'soft_play'. Perhaps
>>>> if we keep the proposal and change the name of the tag to indoor_play, to
>>>> include other types as well, as per brad's suggestion. We should also
>>>> include sub tag qualifiers to specify if it's soft play and for what ages
>>>> it's designed. I think it would be most appropriate to use indoor play
>>>> considering its catch all nature and the fact that it is already used by a
>>>> couple of websites.
>>>>
>>>> I will update the proposal and fill in the definition area, I must have just
>>>> missed it. However, I won't update it till tomorrow because I only have my
>>>> phone until then.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan <bigfatfrog67 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I agree, we need to choose a term that is more generic, maybe
>>>>> leisure=childrens_adventure or kids_play or kids_amusement.  There can
>>>>> always be a sub tag defining soft_play?
>>>>>
>>>>> Especially considering that a lot of softplay areas are now included among
>>>>> other internal children's play features? Softplay is just one bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>
>>>>> http://bigfatfrog67.me
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23/10/2013 17:47, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Instead of "soft play", what about "indoor play" (or indoor play
>>>>> area/centre)?
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) it seems to be used as a catch all sometimes, even in the UK (ie -
>>>>> http://www.timeout.com/london/events/indoor-play-centres-in-london or
>>>>> http://www.dayoutwiththekids.co.uk/things-to-do-family/Northampton/Indoor-Play-Areas)
>>>>> 2) it is broad enough to cover all of these sort of places, since some
>>>>> indoor play areas may only have some actual "soft play" equipment meant for
>>>>> younger kids/toddlers  (or, if you are only meaning the actual areas that
>>>>> have the soft play equipment, then that might be different)
>>>>> 3) it might make more sense for those outside the UK who don't use the
>>>>> term "soft play" much
>>>>>
>>>>> Brad
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Dominic Hosler <dominichosler at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Due to child protection, you are generally not allowed to take
>>>>>> pictures inside the soft-play centres. Also, any official pictures are
>>>>>> copyrighted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the proposal, I linked to a few websites of some soft play centres,
>>>>>> where they have pictures, I hoped this would be fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Soft play is as Jonathan said, padding not inflatables.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Dom
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 October 2013 14:31, Jonathan Bennett <jonobennett at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/10/2013 14:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would they qualify as soft play?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, that's a bouncy castle. Soft play is padding, not inflatables.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>>>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




More information about the Tagging mailing list