[Tagging] deprecate water=intermittent and water=tidal
Christoph Hormann
chris_hormann at gmx.de
Mon Sep 2 15:44:33 UTC 2013
On Monday 02 September 2013, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> but admittedly the alternative approach (intermettent=yes) is used ~3
> times more often...
Of which >90% are from imports as well.
The number of water features manually tagged as intermittent is sadly
negligible.
But yes, intermittent=yes/no makes much more sense for waterbodies than
water=intermittent.
Greetings,
--
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/
More information about the Tagging
mailing list