[Tagging] deprecate water=intermittent and water=tidal

Christoph Hormann chris_hormann at gmx.de
Mon Sep 2 15:44:33 UTC 2013


On Monday 02 September 2013, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> but admittedly the alternative approach (intermettent=yes) is used ~3
> times more often...

Of which >90% are from imports as well.

The number of water features manually tagged as intermittent is sadly 
negligible.

But yes, intermittent=yes/no makes much more sense for waterbodies than 
water=intermittent.

Greetings,

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/



More information about the Tagging mailing list