[Tagging] Power tower and pole usefulness

bredy bredyfox at yahoo.it
Sun Sep 22 12:16:42 UTC 2013

Andreas Labres wrote
> On 21.09.13 21:16, Ole Nielsen wrote:
>> On 21/09/2013 21:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>> I continue to oppose the usage of man_made=tower for electricity lattice
>>> towers (that what has been power=tower until now and which is 4,8
>>> Million times in use). Why should we change this well established
>>> practise, which would require 4,8 Million new additional tags
>>> (tower:type=electricity) and which doesn't even help to reduce potential
>>> multivalue conflicts? At least I'd use man_made=power_tower or something
>>> similar, but IMHO if there are problems with power=tower having other
>>> infrastructure on them this should be dealt with in an alternative way
>>> possibly keeping power=tower.


And use tower and pole not about the voltage of line but what I see in the

View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Power-tower-and-pole-usefulness-tp5778321p5778417.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the Tagging mailing list