[Tagging] waterfall

Volker Schmidt voschix at gmail.com
Wed Sep 25 16:32:40 UTC 2013


Hmmm.
Many, if not all waterfalls are *not* vertical in the strict sense of the
word.


On 25 September 2013 14:47, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> 2013/9/25 Janko Mihelić <janjko at gmail.com>
>
>> Maybe waterway=waterfall could be a node on the way (or a a way, if
>> waterfalls are long), and natural=waterfall could be an area showing where
>> they are.
>>
>
>
> maybe that's not a bad idea, waterway=waterfall could be a place where the
> water is falling down (vertical), while natural=waterfall would be an
> entity for the whole area, which represents "the waterfall" (a grouping of
> where in reality you will often have several points of water falling inside
> the same "waterfall") and gets the name, the wikipedia link and so on, and
> which groups all single details about where the water falls.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130925/9e901896/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list