[Tagging] mapping qanats

Martin Koppenhöfer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Fri Sep 27 21:51:56 UTC 2013

Am 27.09.2013 um 21:33 schrieb Michał Sałaban <michal at salaban.info>:

> However it might create confusion with already existing bridge=aqueduct.

IMHO bridge=aqueduct is nonsense, we also don't use bridge=highway or railway, and aqueducts don't have to be bridges, they are also underground, or on solid walls/foundations.

FWIW I am using historic=aqueduct around here for historic aqueducts (I.e. mostly fragments and not a continuous working duct), and would expect sth like man_made as key for working ones, maybe also waterway would be fine.


More information about the Tagging mailing list