[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Bridge types)

fly lowflight66 at googlemail.com
Mon Sep 30 16:17:01 UTC 2013


Am 30.09.2013 17:27, schrieb Philip Barnes:
> On 30/09/2013 15:42 François Lacombe wrote:
>> 2013/9/30 fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com
>> 
>> 
>>     OK, I get your point but you have to admit that most of the times we
>>     have to deal with the standard situation and not with multi-use tunnels.
>>
>> That's because multi-use tunnels are not so mapped in OSM.
>> On the other hand, be sure we can encounter many cases of multi-use
>> tunnels in the world.
>> 
>> Security galleries, parallel of road or train tunnels are more and more
>> used for power transit and telecommunication cables roll out for instance.
>> 
>> Far more globally, hosting a feature inside another is the central question.
>> Are we forced to use relations ?

> And canal tunnels, there is usually a towpath through the same tunnel,
> but we have to map them as separate tunnels, then there are double track
> railway tunnels.

Wait a minute we are talking about culverts and not about general
tunnels. These are not well mapped and lots of tunnel relations are
missing but thats a different story. Not talking about tunnel systems
either.

The question asked was "how to tag a culvert in a tunnel" and better why
can it make sense to use tunnel=yes plus culvert=yes.

cu
fly





More information about the Tagging mailing list