[Tagging] simple_brunnel : one node bridge like xing highway over waterway

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Wed Apr 2 15:59:40 UTC 2014


2014-04-02 16:41 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. <ricoz.osm at gmail.com>:

> have something revolutionary simple in my sleeve for the case where
> a highway is going over a waterway:
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:bridge#Simple_one-node_brunnels_for_way_over_waterway
>
> We have been thinking about it for a while and it seems there is
> some demand which could justify it.
>


you mean, let's go a step back if we can't convince really everybody to map
according to the standards? ;-)
IMHO there is a fundamental problem to your proposal because you want to
connect 2 ways with a node which are in reality disjunct (and then you will
"fix" it with a tag that explains that there is no connection). I do not
believe that this will make things easier, my guess is that inventing
exceptions like this will confuse mappers and blur the idea of our
topological model.
It is also a significant loss of detail because you reduce the length of
the bridge to 0.

cheers,
Martin

_______
You call it brunnel, I'd call it tudge ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140402/2806a2f7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list