[Tagging] Climbing access path

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2014-08-07 11:14 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes <phil at trigpoint.me.uk>:

> Customers implies that climbers have to pay to climb, there is someone
> controlling access, collecting money.
>
> I would go for highway=path, access=climbers.
>



>From how I understood the original poster I'd go for fee=yes /<fee-amount>
and/or access=private.
Access=customers might also have some sense if you have to pay to go there.
I don't see any point in access=climbers (far too specific).
>From a practical point of view I believe you could gain access if you
really wanted to go there (e.g. for mapping): you could always pretend you
were interested in climbing, but noone could then force you to actually
climb (you could have become afraid, or changed your mind for other
reasons).

cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140807/68d5eac9/attachment-0001.html>