[Tagging] bridge=humpback ?

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

> Il giorno 11/ago/2014, alle ore 10:30, Philip Barnes <phil at trigpoint.me.uk> ha scritto:
> 
> I do not like the idea of bridge=movable. whilst true, it is only useful to 
> routers and looses the diversity of OSM, we should not dumb-down tagging just
> because it is not universally understood  Movable in itself could mean many 
> things, lifting, swing or even transporter.


+1, I believe the redesign of bridge tagging, whilst being an improvement because of the introduced sub keys for some properties, still lacks some consistency and logics for some cases, one of them being "movable" which I'd not set as primary bridge value.

Cheers,
Martin