[Tagging] bridge movable vs swing vs swinging

[Richard Z.]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 09:25:33AM -0300, John Packer wrote:
> > Just noticed that some mappers resort to adding building=yes or similar to
> > make it render at all.
> 
> Note that bridges that are buildings actually exist. [1]
> 
> But adding building=* to a bridge when it's not the case would be "tagging
> (incorrectly) for the renderer".

the one case I have examined is a clear case of tagging for the renderer.

I can somewhat understand it when someones local landmark bridge doesn't
show up using the correct methods.


Richard