[Tagging] bridge=humpback ?

[Richard Z.]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:54:11AM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> 2014-08-11 18:28 GMT+02:00 Christopher Hoess <cahoess at gmail.c
> <cahoess at gmail.com>
> 
> 
> > As the author of the last big redesign, I'm having trouble understanding
> > some of these criticisms and would appreciate it if people would draw out
> > the critique a bit so I can try to improve things.
> >
> >
> >
> Some people consider freeform values in bridge tag as a problem and think
> that bridge tag should have only yes/no values and specific
> type of bridge should be stored in a separate tag. It is notable as these
> people maintain Default Style - see
> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/440

the result of the mentioned redesign is exactly that - there should be much
fewer freeform values now. Other subtypes of bridges (humpback, suspension, 
drawbridge, swing etc) have been moved to subtags bridge:structure and 
bridge:movable.

It would be important that those few bridge values that remained after the 
redesign are rendered.

Also rendering the outline of man_made=bridge would be a huge progress.

Richard