[Tagging] problem with bicycle=designated

[Andre Engels]

I myself, and I think more Dutch mappers, are using bicycle=designated
(along with highway=residential or perhaps highway=unclassified) for a
so called "fietsstraat" ("cyclestreet"). It's a road that has been set
up for bicycles, but has access for all road users. Often they have a
board like http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/84/Fietsstraat.JPG/207px-Fietsstraat.JPG
(text: "Cyclestreet - Cars are guests").

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com> wrote:

> So how one should tag in following situations?
I would tag as follows:

> 1) official cycleway
highway=cycleway

> 2) road/footway/path widely used by cyclists, cycling is legal
highway=footway/path, bicycle=yes

> 3) road/footway/path widely used by cyclists, cycling is illegal but usually
> nobody
> bothers to enforce this rule
highway=footway/path, bicycle=permissive

> 4) road/footway/path not used widely by cyclists, cycling is illegal
highway=footway (bicycle=no implied) or highway=<roadtype>/path, bicycle = no

> 5) road where normally cyclists are banned but special signs/some other
> rules
> change this
bicycle=yes

> 6) signed cycle route, cycling is legal
Whichever of the above applies

> 7) signed cycle route, cycling is illegal but usually nobody bothers to
> enforce this rule
Idem

> 8) signed cycle route, cycling is illegal and this rule is enforced
Idem

-- 
André Engels, andreengels at gmail.com