[Tagging] problem with bicycle=designated

[John F. Eldredge]

Are you allowed to walk on the cycle path while pushing a broken-down bicycle (for example, if the chain breaks)?  I have been on some bicycle paths where brush grows up to the edge of the path, so there would not be room to walk next to the path.


On August 19, 2014 3:23:51 AM CDT, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > Il giorno 18/ago/2014, alle ore 22:00, SomeoneElse
> <lists at mail.atownsend.org.uk> ha scritto:
> > 
> > They _exactly_ fit the British English definition of a cycleway,
> actually (in fact, most places that I've been apart from Germany) -
> you can both walk and cycle on them.
> 
> 
> In Germany, France and Italy (at least) you can't walk on a cycleway
> by default, i.e. unless there are additional signs permitting
> pedestrians. Thus a combined footway&cycleway is something different
> than a cycleway.
> 
> FWIW, the documented "default" in OSM (if such thing as defaults is
> accepted anyway) is foot=no according to this page linked from the
> cycleway definition:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions
> 
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-- 
John F. Eldredge -- john at jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that.  Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140819/12ed27b4/attachment.html>