[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - nudism
Richard Z.
ricoz.osm at gmail.com
Wed Aug 20 20:46:48 UTC 2014
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:28:13PM +0200, Heiko Wöhrle wrote:
Hi,
> yes i changed the values because i found the differentiation between
> "customary with prevalent nudity" and "permissive but not prevalent nudity"
> difficult.
>
> But i had a mistake in my description, it should be:
> "designated" to places where nudity is officially permitted but not
> obligatory
>
> Hope this clarifies it... Or maybe you can point a possible differentiation
> if we keep both
we are trying to squeeze into one value something that has many more
aspects:
* legal: allowed yes/no/unkonwn/dontcare
obligatory yes/no/unknown .. more values?
* "prevalence" maybe widespread, customary, clothing optional
* local usage : eg permissive is fairly well understood in many places
Will one tag be enough? I think there are not so many meaningful combinations
so one tag could work but we should not be afraid to list many possible values.
Richard
More information about the Tagging
mailing list