[Tagging] Reproposal of tourism=aquarium

[John Packer]

>
> And I feel like most of the values would better fit with a key like
> amusement _ride=  or amusement _ride:xxx=yes.

Now that you mentioned I just remembered.
There is a proposal that uses the key attraction=* for describring objects
from theme parks, zoos, etc.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:attraction

So apparently the key attraction=* is already used for something else.


2014-08-25 7:40 GMT-03:00 Andreas Goss <andig88 at t-online.de>:

> +1, tourism=attraction is a poor scheme from the early days, maybe we
>> should deprecate it all together, either without alternative or in favor of
>> a flag like attraction=yes (or level0 - level 3 etc), or
>> tourist_attraction=*
>>
>
> I also just see it ending up in 2x tagging everything. leisure=waterpark
> tourism=attraction + attraction=waterpark; amenity=restaurant
> tourism=attraction + attraction=restaurant etc.
>
> And I feel like most of the values would better fit with a key like
> amusement _ride=  or amusement _ride:xxx=yes.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusement_ride
>
> I mean for example a kiddie_ride you find at a supermarket is not a
> (tourist) attraction.
> __________
> openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
> wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140825/1a2e2e0c/attachment.html>