[Tagging] include smoothness=* in JOSM presets?

[Bryan Housel]

We are supporting `smoothness` in iD.  Now as of a month ago, we display friendlier (and translatable) text descriptions for these kinds of dropdown fields. (e.g. sac_scale, track type, trail_visibility, etc)

When I added these last month, I did borrow heavily from the descriptions on the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness.
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/blob/master/data/presets/fields/smoothness.json

thanks, Bryan



On Aug 30, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 2014-08-30 13:54 GMT+02:00 Paul Hartmann <phaaurlt at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
> 
> there have been requests to include the tag smoothness=* in the JOSM presets [1]. Everywhere the user can fill in surface=*, we would add an additional option for smoothness=*. Apart from the value (excellent, good, ...) we would include the explanation from the wiki into the selection combo box.
> 
> Do you think this tag is considered mainstream by now or are there still many people who oppose the usage of this tag?
> 
> I know there have been lengthy discussions on this topic before and I don't want to start another one. This is supposed to be something like a quick poll.
> 
> [1] http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/6881
> 
> Paul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> I use smoothness and I would welcome it in JOSM. I am not really happy about it, but I was unable to invent something better and it 
> not as bad as say maxspeed:practical.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140830/a9b0907f/attachment.html>