[Tagging] semantic issue with "genus" in the wiki, wetland, plant nursery, ...
marc.gemis at gmail.com
Mon Dec 1 11:07:14 UTC 2014
I'm interested in this topic in order to be able to map flowerbeds in a
rose garden. Besides the problem with the genus/species/taxon tagging, I
also need to be able to properly tag the flowerbeds themselves. There seems
to be quite some variants for that as well.
So I hope the outcome of this discussion is also applicable to flowerbeds.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com
> I believe there are some semantic issues with how the wiki currently
> suggests to tag details of plants, e.g. with the tags "genus" or "species".
> This originates from tree tagging (AFAIK), where the suggested tagging is:
> NO ISSUES in this, works as expected, we add the genus (will use this as
> example for reference in this mail, but species, taxon, etc. behave the
> same) of the plant (tree in this example) as a tag.
> Now to plant nurseries, according to the wiki the suggested tagging is
> (they do not have their own tag but rely on the landuse attribute, but that
> is another topic I will not deal with here):
> plant=* The generic type of plant that is grown, e.g. tree, herb, bush,
> grass, vine, fern, moss, green-algae
> wait, this is strange, the same tag "genus" now does not refer to the
> object it is attached to (an implicit plant_nursery) but refers to the
> plants that are grown.
> Similarly, on the genus key page, there are references to natural=wetland
> I think this is an inconsistency in tagging and would be interested to
> hear if you believe the recommendation should be changed. E.g. we could
> have a "plant:genus" to explicitly state that the genus refers to the
> plants rather than the nursery.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging