[Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico
lowflight66 at googlemail.com
Tue Dec 16 12:36:50 UTC 2014
Am 16.12.2014 um 13:04 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> 2014-12-16 12:36 GMT+01:00 johnw <johnw at mac.com <mailto:johnw at mac.com>>:
> Building=Civic + civic=civic_services if it offers something to them
> (a place for activities, government funded things or services)
> building=civic + civic=civic_admin if it is a place where they go
> for paperwork, IDs or whatnot, or both admin and services together
> (admin takes priority).
> I wouldn't tag any service by using the building tag. "Building" is
> about buildings, not services (which might be implied in some cases).
> Agree with you about an new amenity, IMHO something like "counseling" or
> consulting service would be the direction for the specific case of
> informagiovani, together with subtags (for whom etc.) or maybe use
> office=employment_agency and some subtags.
What kind of amenity ?
Do we really need it ?
Think this fits well with office=* either as subtag of an existing value
or as subtag of a new value like consulting_service.
More information about the Tagging