[Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

fly lowflight66 at googlemail.com
Tue Dec 16 12:36:50 UTC 2014


Am 16.12.2014 um 13:04 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> 
> 2014-12-16 12:36 GMT+01:00 johnw <johnw at mac.com <mailto:johnw at mac.com>>:
> 
>     Building=Civic + civic=civic_services if it offers something to them
>     (a place for activities, government funded things or services) 
> 
>     or 
> 
>     building=civic + civic=civic_admin if it is a place where they go
>     for paperwork, IDs or whatnot, or both admin and services together
>     (admin takes priority). 
> 
> 
> 
> I wouldn't tag any service by using the building tag. "Building" is
> about buildings, not services (which might be implied in some cases).

+1

> Agree with you about an new amenity, IMHO something like "counseling" or
> consulting service would be the direction for the specific case of
> informagiovani, together with subtags (for whom etc.) or maybe use
> office=employment_agency and some subtags.

What kind of amenity ?
Do we really need it ?

Think this fits well with office=* either as subtag of an existing value
or as subtag of a new value like consulting_service.

cu fly



More information about the Tagging mailing list