[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Obligatory vs. optional cycletracks)

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at gmail.com
Mon Dec 22 05:24:32 UTC 2014


No, no, no.

Cycleway key is already used for a different purpose! Cycleway=lane,
cycleway=opposite,
cycleway=shared_lane etc may be either obligatory or optional.

This proposal would mean that one may record either type of cycleway or its
legal implications but not both!

Also, link to a detailed proposal is missing in your message.

2014-12-22 2:20 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Lamm <ulamm.brem at t-online.de>:

> Hi all,
>
> I've written a proposal for the tags cycleway=obligatory and
> cycleway=optional.
>
> Now I hope for your comments.
>
> Ulrich
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141222/448e9f4a/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list