[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Obligatory vs. optional cycletracks)

Hubert sg.forum at gmx.de
Mon Dec 22 11:30:33 UTC 2014


The need to distinguish between obligatory and optional cycle ways is quite
common. Right now it's done by distinguishing between
bicycle=official/designated and bicycle=yes or bicycle=official and
bicycle=designated/yes.
In a similar way, I think it is better to use something like
bicycle=obligatory instead of cycleway= optional since it is more of an
access problem, than a type problem. (I also don't like cycleway=opposite)
After all the only difference is where one may or must ride. The cycle way
itself does look the same, except for the missing sing.

On Montag, 22. Dezember 2014 02:20 Ulrich Lamm <ulamm.brem at t-online.de>
wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've written a proposal for the tags cycleway=obligatory and
> cycleway=optional.
> 
> Now I hope for your comments.
> 
> Ulrich

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141222/c3fb6b94/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list