[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - trafficability

[Dave Swarthout]

I agree with Philip. Trafficability is not a good choice of terms. The root
word, traffic, is more a descriptor of the types and/or density of vehicles
using a way rather than something to rank its usability under certain
conditions.

Perhaps usability or passable or ??? Both passable (21) and impassable
(951) are already in use as keys to describe highways.

I dunno



On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Dan S <danstowell+osm at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It reminds me quite a lot of opening_hours
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
> Would that be appropriate?
>
> Dan
>
>
> 2014/1/3 BGNO BGNO <bgno2014 at gmail.com>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am proposing a new key:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/trafficability
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > BGNO
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>



-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140103/50604617/attachment.html>