[Tagging] "Relations are not categories" excepted for "type=network" ?

[Pieren]

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Just thought of this: since a node can belong to multiple networks (cycling,
> walking, equestrian), we need a tagging scheme for the network name that
> takes this into account.
> So something like : network:rcn:name, network:rwn:name and network:ren:name

No, the tags on the node should be moved to the appropriate route
relation where you also set the network_:name.

> both rcn and rwn are already used in the numbering of the nodes (rwn_ref,
> rcn_ref). I'm not familiar with the equestrian networks

Is this question related to the "network" relation ?

> Another problem is for routes that form the connection between 2 networks.
> Right now, they are placed in the 2 network relations. How would you tag the
> network names for them ?

Create two route relations, one per network.

Pieren