[Tagging] min_age vs. minage

fly lowflight66 at googlemail.com
Tue Jul 22 17:28:39 UTC 2014


Am 22.07.2014 18:58, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> 
> 2014-07-22 18:31 GMT+02:00 Никита <acroq3 at gmail.com
> <mailto:acroq3 at gmail.com>>:
> 
>     Hello everyone! Target minage (age_group) should be different from
>     legal minage (current tag min_age).
> 
> 
> 
> generally agree (there might be exceptions etc., and it really is not a
> strictly legal restriction but more kind of a guideline in the cases I
> know of). Still as mentioned before, for schools and kindergartens there
> is ISCED level as a tag for an international standard.
> 

+1

Please, also think about the existing confusion and about the future.
Mappers will always mix up the tags/definitions if tag names are that
similar.

If we need different tags for legal vs providing/dedicated we should use
a completely different tag like age_group=* , dedicated_age=* or similar.

By the way there is no kindergarten [1] nor school tagged with *age* or
min* so far. min_age is not mentioned on both wiki pages. e.g. we should
remove the example on the min_age wiki page.

Cheers fly


[1]
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=amenity&value=kindergarten#combinations

[2]
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=amenity&value=school#combinations



More information about the Tagging mailing list