[Tagging] min_age vs. minage
fly
lowflight66 at googlemail.com
Tue Jul 22 17:28:39 UTC 2014
Am 22.07.2014 18:58, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> 2014-07-22 18:31 GMT+02:00 Никита <acroq3 at gmail.com
> <mailto:acroq3 at gmail.com>>:
>
> Hello everyone! Target minage (age_group) should be different from
> legal minage (current tag min_age).
>
>
>
> generally agree (there might be exceptions etc., and it really is not a
> strictly legal restriction but more kind of a guideline in the cases I
> know of). Still as mentioned before, for schools and kindergartens there
> is ISCED level as a tag for an international standard.
>
+1
Please, also think about the existing confusion and about the future.
Mappers will always mix up the tags/definitions if tag names are that
similar.
If we need different tags for legal vs providing/dedicated we should use
a completely different tag like age_group=* , dedicated_age=* or similar.
By the way there is no kindergarten [1] nor school tagged with *age* or
min* so far. min_age is not mentioned on both wiki pages. e.g. we should
remove the example on the min_age wiki page.
Cheers fly
[1]
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=amenity&value=kindergarten#combinations
[2]
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=amenity&value=school#combinations
More information about the Tagging
mailing list