[Tagging] Fireplace, Fire Pit, BBQ Grill

[Brad Neuhauser]

I get what you're saying, but I think fire_site would be too generic. What
about using fire_ring instead? Whether it's dug into the ground or not,
made of metal or stone, etc, these are usually circular.

On the other hand, leisure=firepit has over 800 uses, while fire_site and
fire_ring have zero. Rather than introducing other tags, would it be better
to just better define and document what firepit should be used for?



On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com
> wrote:

>
> 2014-06-23 16:22 GMT+02:00 Brad Neuhauser <brad.neuhauser at gmail.com>:
>
> I would agree with Martin and disagree with John there. I guess I have a
>> broader definition of fire pit/ring as something that exists mainly to
>> contain a fire on the ground, and which may or may not be used for cooking.
>
>
>
> what about "fire_site", would that be a suitable neutral / structure
> independent term which could avoid misinterpretation? Or is this too
> generic and won't imply any kind of dedicated structure (i.e. it would say
> that there is a spot where a fire had been / could be lit, but it won't say
> that the place is suitable to do so)? I somehow do agree with John that
> literally a fire pit should be "dug into the ground".
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140623/099232b3/attachment.html>