russell.deffner at hotosm.org
Thu Mar 13 16:09:06 UTC 2014
My two cents:
"dirt" maybe applies only to road surface
"ground" human impacted 'earth'
"earth" as natural as remains depending on location
From: Georg Feddern [mailto:osm at bavarianmallet.de]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:03 AM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] surface=ground/dirt/earth
Am 13.03.2014 15:56, schrieb fly:
> On 13.03.2014 15:37, Fernando Trebien wrote:
>> But do you think that earth and ground are different kinds of surface?
> Well, I would consider earth as earth where ground could be earth but
> does not have to be.
> All together, I think we could get rid of at least one out of the three
> tags after updating the descriptions but this will not that easy with
> existing tags in common use.
aehm, well - and which one would you get rid of?
Some times ago I remember a likewise identical discussion at the german
Used for ways where the underground consists of different and often
changing parts like rock, earth, vegetation (generic value) - as you say
Used for ways where the underground consists of - well, earth (natural
See above - the term seems to be outside of OSM used for a "man made" /
constructed work - which inside OSM seems to be the (defined) value
So I would get rid of dirt, but keep 'earth' beside 'ground' as a useful
value (smooth walking on hiking trails) .
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging