[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - use_sideway (was bicycle=use_cycleway)

Pee Wee piewie32 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 21 07:26:57 UTC 2014

We followed Pieren's advice on the Talk
made the proposal
shorter.  This focuses on making clear what the proposal is and not so much
on our arguments. For those that are interested in our arguments we've made
a   sub page<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/use_sideway_arguments>
including our comment on last proposal. Hope this helps.

With regard to Matthijs his question I can say that in yesterday's
newspaper (algemeen dagblad)  I read that NL has 35.000 KM of cycleways.

Not sure why Matthijs qoute's the "no backward compatibility to the
existing bicycle=no (in e.g. NL)" .  We've commented on that in the
proposal (which has moved to the subpage)



2014-03-17 0:07 GMT+01:00 Matthijs Melissen <info at matthijsmelissen.nl>:

> On 16 March 2014 17:34, Pee Wee <piewie32 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Last november we proposed the "bicycle=use_cycleway".  There was a lot of
> > discussion before and during voting. The voting was very close but we
> > decided to reject the proposal and work on a new one.
> | no backward compatibility to the existing bicycle=no (in e.g. NL)
> Just curious: can anyone find out how many percent of the ways with
> highway=cyclepath are located in the Netherlands? It seems Tagwatch
> doesn't exist anymore, so I don't really know how to get these data.
> -- Matthijs
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Verbeter de wereld. Word mapper voor Openstreetmap<http://www.openstreetmap.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140321/59f7a8c2/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list