[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - use_sideway (was bicycle=use_cycleway)

[Pee Wee]

We followed Pieren's advice on the Talk
page<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/use_sideway>and
made the proposal
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/use_sideway>much
shorter.  This focuses on making clear what the proposal is and not so much
on our arguments. For those that are interested in our arguments we've made
a   sub page<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/use_sideway_arguments>
including our comment on last proposal. Hope this helps.

With regard to Matthijs his question I can say that in yesterday's
newspaper (algemeen dagblad)  I read that NL has 35.000 KM of cycleways.

Not sure why Matthijs qoute's the "no backward compatibility to the
existing bicycle=no (in e.g. NL)" .  We've commented on that in the
proposal (which has moved to the subpage)

Cheers

PeeWee32


2014-03-17 0:07 GMT+01:00 Matthijs Melissen <info at matthijsmelissen.nl>:

> On 16 March 2014 17:34, Pee Wee <piewie32 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Last november we proposed the "bicycle=use_cycleway".  There was a lot of
> > discussion before and during voting. The voting was very close but we
> > decided to reject the proposal and work on a new one.
>
> | no backward compatibility to the existing bicycle=no (in e.g. NL)
>
> Just curious: can anyone find out how many percent of the ways with
> highway=cyclepath are located in the Netherlands? It seems Tagwatch
> doesn't exist anymore, so I don't really know how to get these data.
>
> -- Matthijs
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>



-- 
Verbeter de wereld. Word mapper voor Openstreetmap<http://www.openstreetmap.org>
.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140321/59f7a8c2/attachment.html>