[Tagging] layer=-1, rivers, bridges and tunnels
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Fri May 2 12:16:04 UTC 2014
2014-04-24 0:52 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:
> If one could simply delete the layer=-1 on a waterway, without getting
> yelled at by validators, then human effort could be directed to those true
> oddball situations (like canals crossing each other) that really need
> detailed tagging.
why would you want to remove valid detail? Even if it seems redundant at
first glance still it is a kind of confirmation and therefor better than an
implicit default (IMHO).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging