[Tagging] [OSM-talk] boules=petanque vs. type=petanque
jm at liotier.org
Thu May 15 16:26:35 UTC 2014
On 15/05/2014 18:22, fly wrote:
> Pretty much everyone has agreed that the type=* is being abused and that
> chaining sport=boules;boules=petanque is cleaner so I'm going to correct
> the 718 occurrences of sport=boules;type=petanque into
> This would be an automatic edit and at least should be open for
> discussion for more than some days.
Yes - I'll let it cool down for a while.
>> I might also do it for sport=boules;type=bocce which would become
>> There are 1093 occurrences of sport=boules;type=* :
> Well then why not use boules:type ?
From messages here, on talk and on talk-fr, there seem to be a
consensus about namespace chaining such as sport=boules;boules=bocce. No
one has offered sport=boules;boules:type=bocce - maybe because the
boules namespace most probably won't expand into complexity that
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging