[Tagging] natural=ridge vs natural=arete

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at gmail.com
Tue Nov 4 13:04:07 UTC 2014


I think that natural=arete should be rather subtag of natural=ridge
(natural=ridge; ridge=arete).
It is opening way for next specialized tags - what will make using data
significantly harder.

2014-11-04 13:58 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. <ricoz.osm at gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> following some discussions on github (1) and talk-at (2) I have tried
> to clarify the definition of natural=ridge in the wiki
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:natural%3Dridge&diff=1104725&oldid=998905
>
> Not sure if this is good enough, personaly I would prefer a single ridge
> key with additional subkeys denoting properties such as gentle,sharp, cliff
> ridges.
>
> 1. https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1097
> 2.
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2014-November/007058.html
>
> Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141104/d286eb90/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list