[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap
kotya.lists at gmail.com
Mon Nov 17 22:26:48 UTC 2014
What about introducing a name space:
water_source:potable=designated | mineral | heilwasser (I failed to find a
good English-language analogue, could someone help please?)
water_source:sparkling=yes | no | unknown
water_source:nonpotable=compromised | designated
In principle, details regarding the kind of water source could be provided
here as well, to free up the top level a bit and help data users:
water_source:type = tap | fountain | well | spring
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com
> 2014-11-13 6:50 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:
>> Let's start with the cases:
>> * Designated potable, as in from a city tap.
>> * Designated non-potable, as in from a farm ditch, or purple pipe (USA).
>> This would include designated irrigation water of most sorts.
>> * Potable but with a known defect such as high mineral content.
>> * Unspecified. This may cover most backcountry springs where no testing
>> is done, but no promises are made.
>> * Compromised. For example a muddy spring or clearly impacted water
>> source usable only in dire emergencies.
> there are more types of water that might be interesting to people:
> - mineral water http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mineral_water
> - sparkling attribute (if it is naturally effervescent)
> - in Germany there is a subclass of mineral water (~"healing water" in
> German "Heilwasser") which has positive physiologic effects.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging