[Tagging] Feature proposal - Power transmission - few more feedback needed

François Lacombe fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
Thu Nov 20 11:01:43 UTC 2014


Good morning,

I did several more edits on the Power transmission refinement proposal and
I'd like to have a little more feedbacks
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement

Two points are concerned :
- Terminations/transitions
tower:type=power_termination and tower=power_transition are planned to be
used for such features.
Adding power_ in values was a request on Talk page and splitting
termination and transitions on two keys too.

Comment here :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement#tower:type_vs._power_tower:type_and_pole:type_vs._power_pole:type

- power=line vs minor_line
As to maintain power line scale distinguishing and add information on our
tags, it is now proposed to use line=* and 5 or 6 different values.
power=minor_line is a mix of line=distribution and line=minor_distribution
opposed from line=transmission
We'll have to replace power=minor_line by a significant benefit on
information and consistency with other related tagging schemes (substation).


Once those points resolved, the second vote will start.


All the best


*François Lacombe*

fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com
www.infos-reseaux.com
@InfosReseaux <http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141120/d29cd279/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list