[Tagging] Vandalis on access page

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at gmail.com
Wed Oct 8 12:18:26 UTC 2014


It is perfectly fine to revert somebody. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle

2014-10-08 12:48 GMT+02:00 Pee Wee <piewie32 at gmail.com>:

> If I understand correctly you say it would be better if the wiki stated
> that the compulsory cycleway is drawn as a separte way. I think you are
> right. I could changed that in the wiki. Unfortunately the user Ulamm has
> changed the wiki (for the worse in my opinion) so I'll send him an email
> before I make any changes.
>
> Cheers
>
> PeeWee32
>
> 2014-10-08 12:34 GMT+02:00 Hubert <sg.forum at gmx.de>:
>
>> Thanks for the help and the links. That was my opinion, too.
>>
>> I asked, because the use is not clear by just reading the definition and
>> not looking at the examples.
>>
>> highway=road + cycleway=track + bicycle=use_sidepath together, without an
>> additional highway=cycleway OSMWay (for example) seem correct by definition.
>>
>> I can understand the confusion. Should the use be made more prominent in
>> the description of the value?
>>
>>
>>
>> Yours
>>
>> Hubert
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Verbeter de wereld. Word mapper voor Openstreetmap
> <http://www.openstreetmap.org>.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141008/033fddb9/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list