lowflight66 at googlemail.com
Tue Oct 14 16:15:03 UTC 2014
Am 13.10.2014 17:15, schrieb Philip Barnes:
> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 17:00 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>> 2014-10-13 12:28 GMT+02:00 <phil at trigpoint.me.uk>:
>>> I like this proposal too, would it be possible to extend it to
>>> tunnels or would that require a similar proposal?
>> Rather a similar proposal, tunnels are more troublesome (see also talk
+1, yes an additional one but linking to this one
> There does seem to be a lot about multiple tubes there, I would expect
> those to be mapped separately, but would like to see a single tunnel
> only where multiple ways pass through the same tube, such as a double
> track railway or a canal and towpath.
> The channel tunnel should obviously remain as 3 tunnels.
So we use/need it for each tube. The relation is still needed as there
is much more infrastructure connected with a tunnel like air
conditioning and escape ways/tube.
More information about the Tagging