[Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

[John Packer]

>
> Why use contact: here, when it's not used by the majority anywhere else.

+1


2014-08-29 22:46 GMT-03:00 Andreas Goss <andig88 at t-online.de>:

> I don't want to change the addr:-, website-, phone-, fax- or
>> email-key!!! I never said it.
>>
>
> As Tobias pointed out, we have to look at the bigger pucture. Why use
> contact: here, when it's not used by the majority anywhere else.
>
>
>  The contact-namespace associate, that the defined facebook- or
>> googleplus-page are a medium to communicate with the defined object. I
>> know a lot facebook-pages, who are created from fans or generated from a
>> wikipedia-pages. That are mostly not a communication channel.
>>
>
> But those unofficial (fan) pages should not be linked anyway. It would
> always be the official page.
>
> In addition even a lot of those pages are not really used for
> communication, so that seems even more like a argument against contact:,
> especially as mappers are not going to first figure out which company
> replies on google+ and which doesn't.
>
> __________
> openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
> wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140902/6eda9ef2/attachment-0001.html>